Home  ›  How to React to Family Who Criticize Your Anointing as a Christian

How to React to Family Who Criticize Your Anointing as a Christian

Written By Saturday 5 March 2022 Add Comment Edit

Criticism of Jesus has existed since the offset century. Jesus was criticised by the Pharisees and scribes for disobeying Mosaic Police. He was decried in Judaism as a failed Jewish messiah claimant and a false prophet by most Jewish denominations. Judaism also considers the worship of any person a form of idolatry,[4] [v] and rejects the claim that Jesus was divine. Some psychiatrists, religious scholars and writers explain that Jesus' family, followers (John 7:20) and contemporaries seriously regarded him as delusional, possessed by demons, or insane.[half dozen] [vii] [viii] [9] [ten]

Early on critics of Jesus and Christianity included Celsus in the second century and Porphyry in the tertiary.[11] [12] In the 19th century, Friedrich Nietzsche was highly critical of Jesus, whose teachings he considered to be "anti-nature" in their treatment of topics such equally sexuality. More than contemporary notable critics of Jesus include Ayn Rand, Hector Avalos, Sita Ram Goel, Christopher Hitchens, Bertrand Russell, and Dayananda Saraswati.

Criticism by Jesus' contemporaries [edit]

Defiance of Mosaic law [edit]

The Pharisees and scribes criticized Jesus and his disciples for non observing Mosaic Law. They criticized his disciples for not washing their easily before eating. (The religious leaders engaged in ceremonial cleansing similar washing up to the elbow and baptizing the cups and plates before eating food in them—Mark 7:1-23, Matthew 15:1-twenty.) Jesus is also criticized for eating with the publicans (Marking 2:xv). The Pharisees besides criticized Jesus' disciples for gathering grain on the Sabbath (Mark 2:23–3:half dozen).

[edit]

The virtually hitting characteristics of the utterances of Jesus were his merits to Godhood (which was only uttered by his followers and enemies), for which some of the Jews attempted to stone him, and a few succeeded in handing him over for crucifixion (which Pilate himself, didn't feel it was correct of correct to do), for committing blasphemy:

"We are non stoning You for any skillful work," said the Jews, "simply for blasphemy, because You lot, who are a man, declare Yourself to be God."[13]

There was besides the tone of authority adopted by him and the claim that spiritual peace and salvation were to be found in the mere credence of his leadership. Passages like: "Take my yoke upon yous . . . and ye shall find residue unto your souls" (Matt. xi. 29); "whosoever shall lose his life for my sake . . . shall save it" (8. 35); "Inasmuch every bit ye accept done information technology unto i of the to the lowest degree of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me" (Matt. xxv. twoscore), indicate an supposition of power which is certainly unique in Jewish history, and indeed accounts for much of modern Jewish contempt to Jesus, so far every bit information technology exists. On the other hand, there is little in whatsoever of these utterances to bear witness that they were meant past the speaker to utilize to anything more than personal relations with him; and it might well be that in his experience he found that spiritual relief was often afforded past simple human trust in his skilful-will and power of direction.[xiv]

Accusations of possession and madness [edit]

Jesus' family and contemporaries regarded him as delusional, possessed past demons, or insane.[vi] [15] [16]

And when his family heard information technology, they went out to seize him, for people were saying, "He is beside himself". And the scribes who came downwards from Jerusalem said, "He is possessed past Be-el′zebul, and by the prince of demons he casts out the demons".

The accusation independent in the Gospel of John is more literal.

In that location was again a division amongst the Jews because of these words. Many of them said, "He has a demon, and he is mad; why heed to him?"

Miracles and exorcisms performed by magic [edit]

In the latter half of the start century and into the second century, Jewish and infidel opponents of Christianity argued that the miracles and exorcisms of Jesus and his followers were the result of magic, which was associated with demons and the occult.[17]

Afterward criticism [edit]

Criticism of Jesus' mental health [edit]

A number of writers, including David Strauss,[vi] Lemuel K. Washburn,[18] Oskar Panizza[19] [xx] [21] and Friedrich Nietzsche,[22] have questioned Jesus' sanity past claiming he was insane for assertive he was God and/or the messiah. Psychologists and psychiatrists Georg Lomer,[23] Charles Binet-Sanglé, [24] William Hirsch,[25] Georges Berguer,[26] [27] Y. 5. Mints, [28] [29] Władysław Witwicki,[30] [31] William Sargant,[32] Raj Persaud,[33] and Anthony Storr,[34] [35] [36] take said Jesus suffered from religious delusions and paranoia.[37] [38] [6]

Criticism of Jesus' teachings [edit]

Slavery [edit]

Avery Robert Dulles held the opinion that "Jesus, though he repeatedly denounced sin as a kind of moral slavery, said not a discussion against slavery as a social institution", and believes that the writers of the New Testament did non oppose slavery either.[39] In his paper published in Evangelical Quarterly, Kevin Giles notes that Jesus frequently encountered slavery, "but non i give-and-take of criticism did the Lord utter against slavery." Giles points to this fact as existence used as an argument that Jesus approved of slavery.[40] In certain major non-English translations,[ attribution needed ] the showtime statement in the outset sermon of Jesus (Luke 4:xviii),[41] is a call to free the slaves: "The Spirit of the Lord is on me, considering he has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the slaves from war,...." (see Cornilescu translation).

Sexuality and humility [edit]

Nietzsche considered Jesus' teachings to be "unnatural".

Friedrich Nietzsche, a 19th-century philosopher, has many criticisms of Jesus and Christianity, fifty-fifty going so far as to style himself as The Anti-Christ. In Human, All Besides Human, and Twilight of the Idols for example, Nietzsche accuses the Church's and Jesus' teachings as beingness anti-natural in their treatment of passions, in detail sexuality: "There [In the Sermon on the Mount] information technology is said, for instance, with particular reference to sexuality: 'If thy eye offend thee, pluck it out.' Fortunately, no Christian acts in accord with this precept...[42] the Christian who follows that advice and believes he has killed his sensuality is deceiving himself: it lives on in an uncanny vampire form and torments in repulsive disguises."[43] Nietzsche does explicitly consider Jesus as a mortal, and furthermore every bit ultimately misguided, the antonym of a true hero, whom he posits with his concept of a Dionysian hero. Nietzsche was repulsed by Jesus' height of the lowly: "Everything pitiful, everything suffering from itself, everything tormented past base of operations feelings, the whole ghetto-world of the soul suddenly on pinnacle!"[44]

However Nietzsche did not demur of Jesus, proverb he was the "merely one true Christian". He presented a Christ whose own inner life consisted of "blessedness in peace, in gentleness, in the inability for enmity". There is much criticism by Nietzsche of the organized institution of Christianity and its class of priests. Christ's evangelism consisted of the good news that the kingdom of God is within you.[45] "What are the 'glad tidings'? Truthful life, eternal life is found—it is not promised, information technology is hither, information technology is within you: as life lived in honey.... 'Sin', every kind of distancing relationship between God and man, is abolished - precisely this is the 'glad tidings'. The 'glad tidings' are precisely that there are no more opposites...."

Ignorance and acrimony [edit]

Dayananda Saraswati, a 19th-century philosopher and the founder of Arya Samaj, in his book Satyarth Prakash, criticized Christianity and described Jesus every bit a "neat thing in a country of uneducated savages":

All Christian missionaries say that Jesus was a very at-home and peace-loving person. But in reality he was a hot-tempered person destitute of knowledge and who behaved similar a wild savage. This shows that Jesus was neither the son of God, nor had he whatever miraculous powers. He did not possess the power to forgive sins. The righteous people do not stand in demand of any mediator like Jesus. Jesus came to spread discord which is going on everywhere in the world. Therefore, it is axiomatic that the hoax of Christ's being the Son of God, the knower of the past and the future, the forgiver of sin, has been set falsely by his disciples. In reality, he was a very ordinary ignorant man, neither learned nor a yogi.[46]

Saraswati asserted that Jesus was non an enlightened man either, and that if Jesus was a son of God, God would have saved him at the fourth dimension of his expiry, and he would not take suffered from astringent mental and physical pain at last moments.

Noting that the Bible writes that women held the feet of Jesus and worshiped him, he questions:

Was information technology the same body which had been cached? At present that torso had been buried for three days, we should like to know why did information technology not decompose?

Unfulfilled predictions of the second coming [edit]

In the 1927 essay Why I Am Non a Christian, Bertrand Russell pointed to parts of the gospel where Jesus could be interpreted as saying that his second coming will occur in the lifetime of some of his listeners (Luke nine:27). He concludes from this that Jesus' prediction was incorrect and thus that Jesus was "not and so wise as some other people have been, and He was certainly not superlatively wise".[47]

Though Russell believed Jesus 'had a very high degree of moral goodness', he too felt there were some notable flaws in his graphic symbol.[48] In his essay he wrote:

There is i very serious defect to my heed in Christ'due south moral grapheme, and that is that He believed in hell. I exercise not myself feel that any person who is really greatly humane can believe in everlasting penalization. Christ certainly as depicted in the Gospels did believe in everlasting penalisation, and one does find repeatedly a vindictive fury against those people who would not listen to His preaching -- an mental attitude which is not uncommon with preachers, but which does somewhat detract from pinnacle excellence. You do not, for instance notice that attitude in Socrates. Yous observe him quite bland and urbane toward the people who would not listen to him; and it is, to my heed, far more worthy of a sage to accept that line than to take the line of indignation. [49]

Russell also expresses doubt over the historical existence of Jesus and questions the morality of religion: "I say quite deliberately that the Christian faith, every bit organized in its churches, has been and even so is the principal enemy of moral progress in the earth."[50]

Proscribing virtue and prohibiting vice [edit]

Novelist and philosopher Ayn Rand denounced the altruist recipe that Jesus passed down to his pupils, and with information technology the idea of vicarious redemption. She thought that even Christians, who call up of Jesus in the highest possible terms, should feel outraged by the notion of sacrificing virtue to vice.[51] Not surprisingly, her agreement of love as a outcome of the rational heed looking after embodied values considers the ideas Jesus is most famous for as immoral. Consider the following excerpt from a 1959 interview conducted by Mike Wallace:

Wallace: Christ, every of import moral leader in man'due south history, has taught the states that nosotros should love 1 another. Why then is this kind of love in your mind immoral?
Rand: It is immoral if information technology is a beloved placed above oneself. It is more than immoral, it'due south impossible. Because when y'all are asked to dear everybody indiscriminately. That is to dearest people without any standard. To dearest them regardless of whether they take any value or virtue, you are asked to dearest nobody.[52]

Withal disagreements over the value of religion and the existence of an afterlife, Rand saw Jesus' insistence on procuring the eternal happiness of individuals as confirmation of the moral defoliation and inconsistency in which much of religious ethics operates, including Christian altruism.[53]

In For the New Intellectual, Rand farther accuses Judeo-Christian tenets such as the doctrine of original sin for their conspicuous immorality. "The evils for which they damn him [man] are reason, morality, creativeness, joy — all the cardinal values of his existence. It is not his vices that their myth of human'south fall is designed to explain and condemn. They call it a morality of mercy and a doctrine of love for man." Rand then proceeds to charge religious leaders with fostering a death cult: "No, they say, they exercise not preach that man is evil, the evil is only that alien object: his trunk. No, they say, they do non wish to kill him, they only wish to make him lose his body."[54]

Foundation of Western imperialism and the Holocaust [edit]

Historian and Hindu activist Sita Ram Goel accused Jesus of being the intellectual author backside Western imperialism and the Holocaust.[55] Goel further writes that Jesus "is no more than an artifice for legitimizing wanton imperialist assailment. He does not symbolize spiritual power or moral uprightness."[56]

He made his example based on the gospels, which he thought bandage too night a shadow on unconverted Jews (see for instance John 8:38-47). From at that place he drew parallels between Jesus and Adolf Hitler, the latter of whom was, in Goel's words, the first to "completely grasp the verdict passed on the Jews past the Jesus of the gospels".[57]

Ram Goel also ridiculed what he termed "the cult of the disentangled Christ", whereby Christian revisionism attempts to salvage the figure of Jesus from the atrocious historical outcomes which he inspired — and only from the bad ones — as though missionary proselytism and Western expansionism were to exist perceived in the separate equally mere coincidences.[57]

Eternal punishment of hell [edit]

The famous American humorist Mark Twain would write in his long suppressed Letters from the Earth:

At present here is a curious thing. Information technology is believed by everybody that while [God] was in heaven he was stern, hard, resentful, jealous, and cruel; just that when he came down to earth and assumed the name Jesus Christ, he became the opposite of what he was earlier: that is to say, he became sweet, and gentle, merciful, forgiving, and all harshness disappeared from his nature and a deep and yearning love for his poor human children took its place. Whereas it was as Jesus Christ that he devised hell and proclaimed it! Which is to say, that as the meek and gentle Savior he was a thousand billion times crueler than ever he was in the Old Testament -- oh, decidedly more atrocious than always he was when he was at the very worst in those old days![58]

Author and journalist Christopher Hitchens, one of the leading exponents in the "New Atheism" movement, was extremely critical of Jesus, Christianity and any faith in general. Regarding Jesus' teachings on hell, Hitchens wrote:

The god of Moses would telephone call for other tribes, including his favorite ane, to suffer massacre and plague and even extirpation, just when the grave closed over his victims he was essentially finished with them unless he remembered to curse their succeeding progeny. Non until the advent of the Prince of Peace do we hear of the ghastly idea of further punishing and torturing the dead.[59]

Hitchens likewise felt that a divine Jesus would exist the more morally problematic by virtue of the trouble of evil, asking:

If Jesus could heal a blind person he happened to meet, then why not heal blindness?[sixty]

Attitude towards non-Jews [edit]

Sam Harris, author of The End of Faith, has expressed ambivalent views on Jesus' teachings. He argues that while Jesus may have been an insightful spiritual master of pity at times, he also taught his followers to fulfill the 'barbaric' constabulary of the Old Attestation, and gave his followers specifics on how to execute heretics. To Harris, Jesus' unresolved frustration and hatred of non-Christians runs contrary to the imagination of contemporary religious moderates, and actually lends honesty to more fundamentalist interpretations of salvation and hell. He wrote:

In add-on to enervating that nosotros fulfill every "jot" and "tittle" of Erstwhile Testament Law, Jesus seems to accept suggested, in John 15:6, further refinements to the practice of killing heretics and unbelievers: "If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth equally a branch, and is withered; and men get together them, and cast them into the fire, and they are burned." Whether we desire to translate Jesus metaphorically is, of course, our business. The trouble with scripture, withal, is that many of its possible interpretations (including most of the literal ones) tin can be used to justify atrocities in defense of the religion.[61]

To the aforementioned end of exposing Jesus in relation to the doctrine of hell, Harris quotes Luke's version of the parable of the talents,[62] which ends with the nobleman graphic symbol saying:

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring here, and slay them before me.[63]

Which is taken to be a self-portrait of Jesus and his ain eschatological views.[64] [65]

Ethical teachings in low-cal of modern ethical standards [edit]

Hector Avalos is maybe the first openly atheist biblical scholar to write a systematic critique of the ethics of Jesus in his book, The Bad Jesus: The Ethics of New Attestation Ideals. Koowon Kim, an associate professor in the Quondam Testament at Reformed Graduate University in Republic of korea remarks in his review of The Bad Jesus: "Whether or not one agrees with the author's conclusions, this volume is the first systematic challenge to New Attestation ethics past an atheist scholar firmly grounded in the Hebrew Bible and its ancient Nearly Eastern context and well-versed in New Testament and Early Christianity."[66]

In a review in Biblical Theology Message, Sarah Rollens, a New Testament scholar at Rhodes College, remarks: "Hector Avalos aims not only to convince us that many portrayals of Jesus based on New Attestation texts are morally or ethically problematic, but as well to demonstrate how scholars have engaged in questionable distortions to minimize, explain away, or otherwise ignore any textual testify that might not comport with modernistic ethical standards."[67]

Criticism of Jesus' life [edit]

Historicity [edit]

While most scholars agree that the baptism of Jesus and the crucifixion of Jesus actually happened,[68] they do not agree on the historical reliability of the Gospels, only believe many of the words and actions attributed to Jesus are interpolation. David Strauss said Jesus' miracles were myths.[69] Johannes Weiss and William Wrede both said that Jesus' messianic secret was a Christian invention.[seventy] Albert Kalthoff believed Jesus' claims to divinity and his apprehensive ancestry were 2 different accounts.[71] Arthur Drews said Jesus did not exist at all, but was simply a myth invented by a cult.[72] [73] [74]

Incarnation [edit]

The Neoplatonist philosopher Porphyry of Tyre (c. 232–c. 304) authored the 15 volume treatise Against the Christians, proscribed by the Emperors Constantine and Theodosius Two, of which only fragments at present survive and were collected by Adolf von Harnack. Selected fragments were published in English translation past J. Stevenson in 1957, of which the following is i case:

Even supposing some Greeks are and then foolish as to call up that the gods dwell in the statues, even that would exist a much purer concept (of faith) than to admit that the Divine Power should descend into the womb of the Virgin Mary, that information technology became an embryo, and after birth was wrapped in rags, soiled with blood and bile, and fifty-fifty worse.[75] [76]

Gospel accounts of Jesus' life [edit]

Celsus, second-century Greek philosopher and opponent of Early Christianity, mounts a broad criticism against Jesus equally the founder of the Christian faith.[11] He discounts or disparages Jesus' ancestry, conception, nascency, childhood, ministry, decease, resurrection, and standing influence. According to Celsus, Jesus' ancestors came from a Jewish hamlet. His female parent was a poor country girl who earned her living past spinning cloth. He worked his miracles by sorcery and was a small, homely human being. This Rabbi Jesus kept all Jewish customs, including sacrifice at the Temple in Jerusalem. He gathered only a few followers and taught them his worst habits, including begging for money. These disciples, amounting to "ten boatmen and a couple of tax collectors" were not respectable. The reports of his resurrection came from a hysterical female, and belief in the resurrection was the consequence of Jesus' sorcery and the crazed thinking of his followers, all for the purpose of impressing others and increasing the chance for others to go beggars.[77] [78]

According to Celsus, Jesus was the inspiration for skulking rebels who deserve persecution.[79]

Celsus stated that Jesus was the bounder kid of the Roman soldier Panthera or Pantera.[80] These charges of illegitimacy are the earliest datable statement of the Jewish charge that Jesus was conceived as the upshot of infidelity (see Jesus in the Talmud) and that his true father was a Roman soldier named Panthera. Panthera was a common name amongst Roman soldiers of that period. The name has some similarity to the Greek adjective parthenos, meaning "virgin".[81] [82] The tomb of a Roman soldier named Tiberius Julius Abdes Pantera, found in Bad Kreuznach, Germany, is taken by some scholars[83] to refer to the Pantera named by Celsus.

According to Celsus, Jesus had no continuing in the Hebrew Bible prophecies and talk of his resurrection was foolishness.[78]

Criticism past other religions [edit]

Criticism in Judaism [edit]

Judaism, which includes Orthodox Judaism, Haredi Judaism, Hasidic Judaism, Reform Judaism, Conservative Judaism, Reconstructionist Judaism, Karaite Judaism, and Samaritan Judaism, entirely rejects the thought of Jesus being a god, a person of a Trinity, or a mediator to God who has a special relationship with Him that somehow makes Jesus "divine". Moreover, it is Avodah Zarah ("foreign worship", which means idolatry) to regard or worship a human as God; in Judaism, too equally in Islam, God is but One, totally transcendent, and cannot exist man (Exodus 20:one–19, Deuteronomy vi:4–nine, 11:13–32).

Judaism also holds that Jesus could not be the Jewish Messiah, arguing that he had not fulfilled whatsoever of the Messianic prophecies foretold in the Tanakh, nor did he embody the personal qualifications of the Messiah foretold past the Prophets. According to Jewish tradition, there were no more prophets later Malachi, who lived centuries before Jesus and delivered his prophecies nigh 420 BCE.[84] [85] Thus Judaism is disquisitional of Jesus' own claims and allusions about his alleged messiahship and his identification as the "son of God",[86] as presented in the New Testament, and considers Jesus to be just one of many individuals who claimed to exist the Messiah, but did not fulfill any of the Messianic prophecies; therefore, they were all impostors.

The Mishneh Torah, 1 of the about authoritative works of Jewish law, written by Moses Maimonides, provides the last established consensus view of the Jewish community, in Hilkhot Melakhim 11:10–12 that Jesus is a "stumbling block" who makes "the majority of the world err to serve a divinity also God".

Even Jesus the Nazarene who imagined that he would be Messiah and was killed past the court, was already prophesied by Daniel. So that it was said, "And the members of the outlaws of your nation would exist carried to make a (prophetic) vision stand. And they stumbled."[Dan. 11:14] Considering, is in that location a greater stumbling-block than this ane? So that all of the prophets spoke that the Messiah redeems State of israel, and saves them, and gathers their banished ones, and strengthens their commandments. And this one acquired (nations) to destroy Israel by sword, and to scatter their remnant, and to humiliate them, and to commutation the Torah, and to make the majority of the world err to serve a divinity also God. Nevertheless, the thoughts of the Creator of the world — there is no force in a man to attain them because our ways are not God'due south means, and our thoughts not God'southward thoughts. And all these things of Jesus the Nazarene, and of (Muhammad) the Ishmaelite who stood afterward him — there is no (purpose) but to straighten out the fashion for the King Messiah, and to restore all the world to serve God together. And then that information technology is said, "Because and then I volition turn toward the nations (giving them) a clear lip, to phone call all of them in the name of God and to serve God (shoulder to shoulder as) one shoulder."[Zeph. iii:9] Look how all the world already becomes full of the things of the Messiah, and the things of the Torah, and the things of the commandments! And these things spread among the far islands and amidst the many nations uncircumcised of heart.[87]

See also [edit]

  • Christian terrorism
  • Christianity and violence
  • History of Christian thought on persecution and tolerance
  • Criticism of the Bible
  • The Bible and violence
  • Criticism of Christianity
  • Historical Jesus
  • Historicity and origin of the Resurrection of Jesus
  • Historicity of Jesus
  • Historicity of the Gospels
  • Jesus in Islam
  • Lewis's trilemma
  • Mental health of Jesus
  • Paul the Apostle and Judaism
  • Problem of Hell
  • Rejection of Jesus
  • Treatise of the Three Impostors

References [edit]

  1. ^ The Cradle, the Cross, and the Crown: An Introduction to the New Testament by Andreas J. Köstenberger, Fifty. Scott Kellum 2009 ISBN 978-0-8054-4365-3 pp. 104–108
  2. ^ Evans, Craig A. (2001). Jesus and His Contemporaries: Comparative Studies ISBN 0-391-04118-5 p. 316
  3. ^ Wansbrough, Henry (2004). Jesus and the Oral Gospel Tradition ISBN 0-567-04090-9 p. 185
  4. ^ Kaplan, Aryeh (1985). The existent Messiah? a Jewish response to missionaries (New ed.). New York: National Conference of Synagogue Youth. ISBN978-1879016118. The existent Messiah (pdf)
  5. ^ Singer, Tovia (2010). Let'south Get Biblical. RNBN Publishers; 2nd edition (2010). ISBN978-0615348391.
  6. ^ a b c d Havis, Don (April–June 2001). "An Inquiry into the Mental Health of Jesus: Was He Crazy?". Secular Nation. Minneapolis: Atheist Brotherhood Inc. ISSN 1530-308X. Retrieved March 29, 2020.
  7. ^ Murray, Evan D.; Cunningham, Miles G.; Price, Bruce H. (Oct 2012). "The Function of Psychotic Disorders in Religious History Considered". Periodical of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. American Psychiatric Association. 24 (four): 410–426. doi:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.11090214. ISSN 1545-7222. OCLC 823065628. PMID 23224447. S2CID 207654711.
  8. ^ Meggitt, Justin J. (June 1, 2007). "The Madness of Male monarch Jesus: Why was Jesus Put to Expiry, just his Followers not?". Journal for the Report of the New Attestation. London: SAGE Publications. 29 (4): 379–413. doi:10.1177/0142064X07078990. ISSN 0142-064X. S2CID 171007891.
  9. ^ Hirsch, William (1912). Religion and Culture: The Conclusions of a Psychiatrist . New York: The Truth Seeker Visitor. p. 135. LCCN 12002696. OCLC 39864035. OL 20516240M. That the other members of his own family unit considered him insane, is said quite plainly, for the openly declare, "He is abreast himself."
  10. ^ Kasmar, Gene (1995). All the obscenities in the Bible. Brooklyn Centre, MN: Kas-mark Pub. Co. p. 157. ISBN978-0-9645-9950-5. He was idea to be insane by his own family unit and neighbors in 'when his friends heard of it, they went out to lay concur on him: for they said, He is beside himself ... (Marker iii:21-22 – The Greek existemi translated beside himself, really means insane and witless), The Greek discussion ho para translated friends, too means family.
  11. ^ a b Chadwick, Henry, ed. (1980). Contra Celsum. Cambridge University Press. p. xxviii. ISBN978-0-521-29576-5.
  12. ^ Stevenson, J. (1987). Frend, Due west. H. C. (ed.). A New Eusebius: Documents illustrating the history of the Church to AD 337. SPCK. p. 257. ISBN978-0-281-04268-5.
  13. ^ Biblehub John 10:33
  14. ^ Jacobs, Joseph et al. "Jesus of Nazareth", Jewish Encyclopedia, 1906Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  15. ^ Hirsch, William (1912). Religion and Civilisation: The Conclusions of a Psychiatrist . New York: The Truth Seeker Visitor. p. 135. LCCN 12002696. OCLC 39864035. OL 20516240M. That the other members of his ain family unit considered him insane, is said quite manifestly, for the openly declare, "He is beside himself."
  16. ^ Kasmar, Cistron (1995). All the obscenities in the Bible. Brooklyn Center, MN: Kas-mark Pub. Co. p. 157. ISBN978-0-9645-9950-5. He was thought to be insane by his ain family unit and neighbors in 'when his friends heard of it, they went out to lay agree on him: for they said, He is beside himself ... (Marking 3:21-22 – The Greek existemi translated beside himself, really means insane and witless), The Greek word ho para translated friends, also means family unit.
  17. ^ Dunn, James D. G. (1999-04-07). Jews and Christians: the parting of the ways, A.D. seventy to 135 : the second Durham-Tübingen Enquiry Symposium on Earliest Christianity and Judaism. ISBN9780802844989.
  18. ^ Washburn, Lemuel K. (1889). Was Jesus insane?. New York: The Truth Seeker Visitor. p. 20.
  19. ^ Panizza, Oskar (1898). "Christus in psicho-patologischer Beleuchtung". Zürcher Diskuszjonen (in German). 5 (1): 1–8. OCLC 782007054.
  20. ^ Düsterberg, Rolf (1988). Die gedrukte Freiheit: Oskar Panizza und dice Zürcher Diskussjonen. Europäische Hochschulschriften; Reihe i, Deutsche Sprache und Literatur; 1098 (in German). Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang. pp. 40–91. ISBNthree-8204-0288-8.
  21. ^ Müller, Jürgen (1990). Oskar Panizza: Versuch einer immamenten Estimation (in German). Würzburg. pp. 248–256. OCLC 923572143.
  22. ^ Nietzsche, Friedrich, The Antichrist, § 31, 32.
  23. ^ Lomer, Georg (1905). Jesus Christus vom Standtpunkte des Psychiaters [Jesus Christ from the Standpoint of a Psychiatrist]. Bamberg: Handels-Druckerei. p. 90. OCLC 31247627.
  24. ^ Gettis, Alan (June 1987). "The Jesus mirage: A theoretical and phenomenological expect". Journal of Religion and Health. Springer. 26 (ii): 131–136. doi:10.1007/BF01533683. ISSN 0022-4197. JSTOR 27505915. OCLC 4643399839. PMID 24301876. S2CID 29415793.
  25. ^ Hirsch, William (1912). Organized religion and civilisation; the conclusions of a psychiatrist . New York: The Truth Seeker Visitor. LCCN 12002696. OCLC 39864035. OL 20516240M.
  26. ^ Berguer, Georges (1920). Quelques traits de la vie de Jésus: au betoken de vue psychologique et psychanalytique (in French). Genève–Paris: Edition Atar. OCLC 417009760.
  27. ^ Berguer, Georges (1923). Some aspects of the life of Jesus from the psychological and psycho-analytic indicate of view . Translated past Brooks, Eleanor Stimson; Brooks, Van Wyck. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co. LCCN 23012901. OCLC 2628145. OL 6656731M.
  28. ^ Sirotkina, Irina (2002). Diagnosing Literary Genius: A Cultural History of Psychiatry in Russian federation, 1880—1930. Baltimore, Physician: Johns Hopkins University Printing. p. 169. ISBN978-0-8018-7689-9.
  29. ^ Минц, Я. В. (1927). "Иисус Христос — как тип душевнобольного" [Jesus Christ: A Sample of Mentally Ill]. Клинический архив гениальности и одарённости (эвропатологии) (in Russian). Vol. 3. Leningrad. pp. 243–252.
  30. ^ Witwicki, Władysław (1958). Dobra Nowina według Mateusza i Marka [The Proficient News according to Matthew and Marker] (in Polish). Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. OCLC 681830910.
  31. ^ Citlak, Amadeusz (2015). "Psychobiography of Jesus Christ in view of Władysław Witwicki's theory of cratism". Periodical for Perspectives of Economic Political and Social Integration. Scientific Society KUL. 21 (i–2): 155–184. doi:x.2478/pepsi-2015-0007. ISSN 2300-0945. OCLC 998362074.
  32. ^ Sargant, William (22 Baronial 1974). "The movement in psychiatry away from the philosophical". The Times: 14. ISSN 0140-0460. Perhaps, even earlier, Jesus Christ might just take returned to his carpentry following the use of mod [psychiatric] treatments.
  33. ^ Persaud, Raj (27 Apr 1993). "Health: A madman can look a lot like a messiah: At that place is no easy fashion for cult followers to tell if their leader is sane, says Raj Persaud". The Contained . Retrieved 2020-03-29 . Two thou years ago Jesus received a crown of thorns. Today the Messianic have electro-convulsive therapy.
  34. ^ Storr, Anthony (1997). Feet of Clay; Saints, Sinners, and Madmen: A Study of Gurus. New York: Costless Printing Paperbacks. pp. 142–147. ISBN0-684-83495-2.
  35. ^ "Obituary: Anthony Storr". The Telegraph. 2001-03-21. Retrieved 2020-03-29 .
  36. ^ "Feet Of Clay: The Power and Charisma of Gurus". Storytel. 2015-05-nineteen. Retrieved 2020-03-29 .
  37. ^ Schweitzer, Albert (1948). The Psychiatric Study of Jesus: Exposition and Criticism . Translated by Joy, Charles R. Boston: Beacon Printing. LCCN 48006488. OCLC 614572512. OL 6030284M.
  38. ^ Bundy, Walter Due east. (1922). The Psychic Health of Jesus . New York: The Macmillan Visitor. LCCN 22005555. OCLC 644667928. OL 25583375M.
  39. ^ Cardinal Dulles, Avery. "Development or Reversal?". First Things. Archived from the original on 2010-07-31.
  40. ^ Giles, Kevin. "The Biblical Argument for Slavery: Can the Bible Mislead? A Case Report in Hermeneutics." Evangelical Quarterly 66 (1994): p. 10 http://www.biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/eq/1994-1_003.pdf
  41. ^ "Luke 4:xviii "The Spirit of the Lord is on Me, because He has anointed Me to preach good news to the poor. He has sent Me to proclaim liberty to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to release the oppressed".
  42. ^ Friedrich Nietzsche, 1895, Twilight of the Idols, Morality as Anti-nature, ane.
  43. ^ Friedrich Nietzsche, 1878, Human all too Man: A Book for Free Spirits, The Wanderer and His Shado, aphorism 83.
  44. ^ "The Antichrist".
  45. ^ The Antichrist, § 34
  46. ^ "Hindu Nationalists of Modern India" past Jose Kuruvachira, p. 20
  47. ^ Russel, Bertrand (1927). Why I am non a Christian in "Why I am Not a Christian: And Other Essays on Faith and Related Subjects," 2004, Routledge Classics, p.13.
  48. ^ Russell, Bertrand. "Why I am Non a Christian" (PDF). www2fiu.edu . Retrieved Feb nine, 2017.
  49. ^ Why I am not a Christian By Russell
  50. ^ Russell, Bertrand. "Why I Am Non a Christian". Archived from the original on 2006-11-19. Retrieved 2007-04-20 .
  51. ^ Alvin Toffler (March 1964). "Playboy Interview: Ayn Rand". Playboy. Archived from the original on 11 January 2016. Retrieved eighteen June 2016.
  52. ^ Ayn Rand (1959). "The Mike Wallace Interview of Ayn Rand" (Interview). Interviewed by Mike Wallace.
  53. ^ Dustin J. Byrd (2015). A Critique of Ayn Rand'southward Philosophy of Religion: The Gospel According to John Galt. Lexington Books. p. 33. ISBN9780739190340 . Retrieved eighteen June 2017.
  54. ^ Ayn Rand (1961). For the New Intellectual. Random House. p. 137. ISBN978-0-451-16308-0.
  55. ^ Burkett, Delbert. The Blackwell Companion to Jesus. p. 285.
  56. ^ Esteves, Sarto (2002). Freedom to build, not destroy: attacks on Christians and their institutions. Media House. p. 66.
  57. ^ a b Sita Ram Goel (1994). Jesus Christ: An Artifice for Aggression.
  58. ^ https://www.sacred-texts.com/aor/twain/letearth.htm
  59. ^ Christopher Hitchens, God is Not Groovy, (2007) pages: 175–176
  60. ^ Christopher Hitchens, God is Not Great, (2007) page: three
  61. ^ Sam Harris, The End of Organized religion, (2004) folio 83
  62. ^ Archived at Ghostarchive and the Wayback Machine: "Sam Harris Religious Moderates problem with assertive in a immoral god". YouTube.
  63. ^ south:Bible (King James)/Luke#19:27
  64. ^ Finley, Tom. The Parable of the Talents and the Parable of the Minas (Matt. 25:14-xxx and Lk. 19:11-27). Online: "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-02-22. Retrieved 2015-04-17 . {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy equally championship (link)
  65. ^ Arland J. Hultgren, The Parables of Jesus: A Commentary, Eerdmans Publishing, 2002, ISBN 0-8028-6077-X, pp. 271-281.
  66. ^ Kim, Koowon. "Review of The Bad Jesus: The Ethics of New Testament Ethics by Hector Avalos". doi:10.11157/rsrr6-2-749.
  67. ^ Rollens, Sarah (2017). "Volume Review: The Bad Jesus: The Ethics of New Testament Ideals". Biblical Theology Bulletin. 47 (two): 127–128. doi:ten.1177/0146107917697910h. S2CID 171576006.
  68. ^ Jesus of Nazareth by Paul Verhoeven (2010) ISBN 1-58322-905-1 p. 39
  69. ^ Familiar Stranger: An Introduction to Jesus of Nazareth by Michael J. McClymond, Eerdmans 2004 ISBN 0802826806 folio 82
  70. ^ Marker as Story: Hindsight and Prospect by Kelly R. Iverson, Christopher Due west., Skinner, Society of Biblical Literature 2011) ISBN 1589835484 p. 183
  71. ^ Kalthoff, Albert (1907). "Was There An Historical Jesus?". The Rise of Christianity. Watts. p. 28. A Son of God, Lord of the World, born of a virgin, and ascension again after death, and the son of a small builder with revolutionary notions, are ii totally different beings. If ane was the historical Jesus, the other certainly was not. The real question of the historicity of Jesus is non only whether at that place ever was a Jesus amidst the numerous claimants of a Messiahship in Judea, only whether we are to recognise the historical graphic symbol of this Jesus in the Gospels, and whether he is to be regarded as the founder of Christianity. (Epitome of p. 28 at Google Books)
  72. ^ Case, Shirley Jackson (1912). The Historicity of Jesus: A Criticism of the Contention that Jesus Never Lived, a Statement of the Evidence for His Existence, an Estimate of His Relation to Christianity. University of Chicago Press. p. 39. Paradigm of p. 39 at Google Books
  73. ^ Weaver, Walter P. (1 July 1999). The Historical Jesus in the Twentieth Century: 1900-1950. A&C Blackness. p. 69. ISBN978-1-56338-280-2. Case [Shirley Jackson Case] and so provided some of the history of the problem, noting the contributions of the French in Charles Dupuis and Constantin Volney (cease of eighteenth century), Karl Bahrdt and Karl Venturini in Frg, Charles Hennell in England, every bit well as the influence of D. F. Strauss and Bruno Bauer. He so listed the main opponents in Germany (Arthur Drews, Albert Kalthoff, Peter Jensen, Samuel Lublinski), in England (J. M. Robertson, M. R. S. Mead, Thomas Whittaker), in Holland (Gerardus J. P. J. Bolland), in France (Charles Virolleaud), Italy (Emilio Bossi), Poland (Andrzej Niemojewski), and America (W. B. Smith).
  74. ^ Barnes, Harry Elmer (1929). The Twilight of Christianity. New York: Vanguard Press. pp. 390–391. Amidst the more eminent scholars and critics who have contended that Jesus was not an actual historical figure nosotros mention Bruno Bauer, Kaithoff, Drews, Stendel, Felder, Deye, Jensen, Lublinski, Bolland, Van der Berg, Virolleaud, Couchoud, Massey, Bossi, Niemojewski, Brandes, Robertson, Mead, Whittaker, Carpenter and W. B. Smith.
  75. ^ J. Stevenson, A New Eusebius: Documents illustrating the history of the Church to Advert 337 (Guild For Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1957; New Edition, revised past W. H. C. Frend, folio 257, 1987). ISBN 0-281-04268-three
  76. ^ Dominic Janes, Romans and Christians, folio 51 (Tempus, 2002). ISBN 978-0752419541
  77. ^ Robert E. Van Voorst, Jesus outside the New Testament, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2000. pp 65-66
  78. ^ a b Raymond Edward Brown, Mary in the New Testament, Paulist Press, 1978. pp 261-262
  79. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2011-01-02. Retrieved 2010-10-xiv . {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived re-create as championship (link)
  80. ^ Origen, Contra Celsus1.32
  81. ^ James D. Tabor, The Jesus Dynasty: The Subconscious History of Jesus, His Royal Family unit, and the Nascency of Christianity, Simon and Schuster, 2006. p 64
  82. ^ Robert E. Van Voorst,Jesus exterior the New Testament, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2000. pp 67-68
  83. ^ James Tabor, The Jesus Dynasty (2006), pages. 64-72
  84. ^ Simmons, Shraga, "Why Jews Do not Believe in Jesus", Retrieved April 15, 2007; "Why Jews Practise non Believe in Jesus", Ohr Samayach — Ask the Rabbi, Retrieved April 15, 2007; "Why do not Jews believe that Jesus was the Messiah?", AskMoses.com, Retrieved April 15, 2007
  85. ^ "The Hammer of God" Page 34 by Stephen Andrew Missick
  86. ^ Whitacre, Rodney A. (2010). "John 7". John (IVP New Testament Commentary). Downers Grove, Ill.: Ivp Academic. ISBN978-0830840045.
  87. ^ Hilchot Malachim (laws apropos kings) (Hebrew)", MechonMamre.org, Retrieved April fifteen, 2007

Farther reading [edit]

  • Toledoth Yeshu, translation of Morris Goldstein (Jesus in the Jewish Tradition) and Alan Humm.
  • Avalos, Hector. The Bad Jesus: The Ethics of New Attestation Ethics (Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Phoenix Printing, 2015)

jackeyhouch1977.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Jesus

0 Response to "How to React to Family Who Criticize Your Anointing as a Christian"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel